LMV License Issue: Supreme Court Concerned About Impact on Drivers’ Livelihood

In a development that has garnered significant attention, the Supreme Court of India has expressed concerns about the potential impact on drivers’ livelihoods if the decision in the case of ‘Mukund Dewangan’ is reversed. The court has urged the Central government to carefully consider amendments to the existing law regarding Light Motor Vehicle (LMV) licenses.

Under the current legal framework, individuals holding LMV licenses, which generally authorize them to operate cars and two-wheelers, are allowed to drive transport vehicles with a Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) of up to 7,500 kilograms. This policy has been in place for a considerable duration.

The ‘Mukund Dewangan’ Case

The case of ‘Mukund Dewangan’ involves a driver who has been operating a transport vehicle under the provisions of the existing law. The Supreme Court had previously allowed such drivers to continue their work based on the validity of their LMV licenses.

Supreme Court’s Concerns

The recent concerns raised by the Supreme Court are primarily centered around the potential reversal of its previous decision in the ‘Mukund Dewangan’ case.

Livelihoods at Stake

The court is acutely aware that a reversal of the previous decision could jeopardize the livelihoods of many drivers who have been operating transport vehicles in reliance on their LMV licenses. This consideration weighs heavily in the court’s discussions.

The Balancing Act

While road safety remains a paramount concern, the court is tasked with striking a balance between ensuring road safety and safeguarding the employment of a substantial number of drivers who may be affected by a change in the existing policy.

Urging the Centre for Amendments

The Supreme Court has urged the Central government to take a judicious approach in considering amendments to the existing law. The goal is to find a solution that addresses road safety concerns without causing undue hardship to drivers who have been operating under the current legal framework.

A Comprehensive Review

The court’s request for amendments reflects a call for a comprehensive review of the policy that would consider various factors, including the qualifications of drivers, training requirements, and the potential for transitional provisions to protect drivers’ livelihoods.

Conclusion

The ‘Mukund Dewangan’ case has brought to the forefront the delicate balance that the Supreme Court must maintain between road safety and the livelihoods of transport vehicle drivers. While road safety remains paramount, the court’s concern for the potential impact on drivers underscores the need for careful deliberation and balanced amendments to the existing LMV license policy.

FAQs (Frequently Asked Questions)

  1. What is an LMV license? An LMV (Light Motor Vehicle) license typically allows individuals to operate cars and two-wheelers but may not cover the operation of larger transport vehicles.
  2. What is the ‘Mukund Dewangan’ case about? The ‘Mukund Dewangan’ case involves a driver who has been operating a transport vehicle under the provisions of the existing law related to LMV licenses.
  3. Why is the Supreme Court concerned about the potential reversal of its decision in the case? The court is concerned about the potential impact on the livelihoods of drivers who have been operating under the existing policy if the decision is reversed.
  4. What is the Supreme Court urging the Central government to do? The Supreme Court is urging the Central government to consider amendments to the existing LMV license policy that strike a balance between road safety and drivers’ livelihoods.

Leave a Comment